Mac Blogging Software …is rubbish?
You’d automatically think that an application you need to pay for would be better than a Firefox plugin. Unfortunately that’s not the case but it baffles me how no one else seems to realise this.
For example take the array of Mac blogging apps out there: Ecto, MarsEdit, Blogo, MacJournal, etc, etc…
Paid for applications and yet they all have a woeful array of features when compared to the free Scribefire Firefox addon.
Scribefire includes Youtube and Flickr integration, article searching, WYSIWYG/HTML/Preview panes, integrated promotion tools, ad serving tools and much much more besides. And did I mention this is all FREE?!
While the Mac community are crying out for substandard apps they paid for to release feature X for their fave blogging app. Why? Why not just switch to Scribefire and save yourself the heart ache?
Or am I missing something?
Related posts:
